http://martinstabe.disqus.com/enFri, 18 Mar 2005 10:50:49 -0000http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2005/03/14/bloggers-and-libel-bad-news/#comment-1927625<p>Didn’t Dow Jones lose a libel case in Australia over the very same issue? That something downloaded in Australia was therefore published there and so subject to Aussie libel laws?</p>Tim WorstallFri, 18 Mar 2005 10:50:49 -0000http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2005/03/14/bloggers-and-libel-bad-news/#comment-1927624<p>Are bloggers also at the same risk as the online archived versions of newspaper articles, which they may quote or comment on, from the <strong>retrospective censorship</strong> and <strong>Contempt of Court</strong> <br>liabilities envisaged by the <a href="http://www.spy.org.uk/spyblog/archives/2004/11/attorney_genera.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.spy.org.uk/spyblog/archives/2004/11/attorney_genera.html">UK Attorney General Lord Goldsmith</a> ?</p>Watching Them, Watching UsTue, 15 Mar 2005 01:25:29 -0000