<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Martin Stabe - Latest Comments in David Maclean MP aims to limit Freedom of Information</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 19:15:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: David Maclean MP aims to limit Freedom of Information</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/19/david-maclean-mp-aims-to-limit-freedom-of-information/#comment-1928239</link><description>Only if it counts for the people that count.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">simon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 19:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Maclean MP aims to limit Freedom of Information</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/19/david-maclean-mp-aims-to-limit-freedom-of-information/#comment-1928238</link><description>Yeah, turns out I got that one pretty wrong, huh. Who would have thought a Private Members Bill would have got so far.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 18:07:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Maclean MP aims to limit Freedom of Information</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/19/david-maclean-mp-aims-to-limit-freedom-of-information/#comment-1928237</link><description>Looked at an earlier article on your site that said the real danger (to freedom of information) was rejecting enquires on cost grounds, i had taken this on board, but this comment also said "David Macleans bill is unlikely to get anywhere of course", underestimation in the depths of infamy that our present crop of Politicians are prepared to go.&lt;br&gt; "Take away that fools bauble, the mace"-Oliver Cromwell addressing Parliament 1653. No point in being a cynic, these people will top you every time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">simon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Maclean MP aims to limit Freedom of Information</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/19/david-maclean-mp-aims-to-limit-freedom-of-information/#comment-1928236</link><description>Our MP's continue to disappoint.  The rationale for this Bill is a "smoke screen" for MPs .    A more like reason is to deny the public access to their expense records and history.   This is why a private members bill is receiving so much support.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 03:36:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Maclean MP aims to limit Freedom of Information</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/19/david-maclean-mp-aims-to-limit-freedom-of-information/#comment-1928235</link><description>Presumably this will also cover e.g. the Commons Library? Currently the only known published location of a number of important documents - not public as such, but nonetheless available via FOI as and when necessary - e.g.when departments try to hide their reports despite ministers announcing publication, putting copies in the library and nowhere else.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doctor_Wbble</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:08:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Maclean MP aims to limit Freedom of Information</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/19/david-maclean-mp-aims-to-limit-freedom-of-information/#comment-1928234</link><description>Tiny Url not working for some reason this morning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the full URL is;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives/2007/1/22/2672382.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_arc...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">IanP</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:44:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Maclean MP aims to limit Freedom of Information</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/19/david-maclean-mp-aims-to-limit-freedom-of-information/#comment-1928233</link><description>trouble is this bill has now received its second reading UNAPPOSED.  This bill is likely to pass through committee stage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have suggested that everyone write to their MP's asking why this bill is passing unapposed, ask them why they are taking away your right to know, and remind them that they work for you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/3x22x9" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/3x22x9&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">IanP</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:41:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>