<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Martin Stabe - Latest Comments in FOIA amendments possible?</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://martinstabe.disqus.com/foia_amendments_possible/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 05:50:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: FOIA amendments possible?</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2005/02/10/foia-amendments-possible/#comment-1927572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Political football on a decidedly unlevel playing field? We all know whose side the ref is on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Turlough</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 05:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FOIA amendments possible?</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2005/02/10/foia-amendments-possible/#comment-1927571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The point of Freedom of Information is improved accountability, etc. &lt;br&gt;Cannot argue with that sentiment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ken</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:26:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>