Hello! Community Page
- www.martinstabe.com/blog Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
- Advertising Age: AOL Cracks Web Publishing — Sans Time Warner
- BBC News: [Telegraph] Editor defends expenses coverage
- OJR: Michael Jackson’s death and its lessons for online journalists covering breaking news
- Reuters Editors: Rethinking rights, accreditation, and journalism itself in the age of Twitter | Blogs |
- Hitwise: Twitter sending traffic to online media sites, but not online retailers
-
Recent Comments
- Thank you for sharing.. I will be downloading this cool plug in.. sure it will be usefull for my sites.. Thanks!
- Thank you for this great theme! We’ve translated it into Polish here.
- Dear Sir, I have been involved in listening to the BBC radio coverage of the tennis, and after 14 days feel sufficiently informed to distinguish between the 17 "colour" commentators,...
- It's just the British model of magazine publishing – quick, cheap and dirty. As opposed to the overstaffed, overengineered American one (see Portfolio). As somebody loosely involved in the...
- I bought this laptop direct from the hp website mostly because of the hard drive space & the huge screen. I was a bit worried that i had gotten my hopes up too high but this product absolutely...
2 years ago
The only possible useful purpose for Crown Copyright is to see that people don't take a dataset and then alter data within it to their own ends. However, that can be sorted by having checksums (a single number generated by doing some maths on the data) - if you change the data, your checksum changes, and it's obvious because you can refer back to the original.
Other than that, CC is just restrictive - nothing more.