<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Martin Stabe - Latest Comments in Freedom of Information, mashups and online journalism</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://martinstabe.disqus.com/freedom_of_information_mashups_and_online_journalism/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 09:29:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Freedom of Information, mashups and online journalism</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/03/03/freedom-of-information-mashups-and-online-journalism/#comment-1928341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for pointing out the Environment Agency's idiocy. This is a part of government which has all this data about water and flooding yet refuses to let us see it. Why??&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only possible useful purpose for Crown Copyright is to see that people don't take a dataset and then alter data within it to their own ends. However, that can be sorted by having checksums (a single number generated by doing some maths on the data) - if you change the data, your checksum changes, and it's obvious because you can refer back to the original.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Other than that, CC is just restrictive - nothing more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 09:29:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>