<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Martin Stabe - Latest Comments in Is Google News biased?</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://martinstabe.disqus.com/is_google_news_biased/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 12:46:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Google News biased?</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2005/05/20/is-google-news-biased/#comment-1927707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bias is in the eye of the beholder.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Try following some topics using the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newsnow.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsnow.co.uk"&gt;http://www.newsnow.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;news aggregator,which claims to be&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Automatically searching 20188 news sources every 5 minutes"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is very instructive to watch the same "story" obviously based on a public relations press release or briefing or leak, being repeated, word for word, by many "sources affiliated with old-media companies", often without attribution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Non-traditional news sources" like blogs do seem to add more comment or analysis to these same stories if they pick up on them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Waatching Them, Watching Us</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 12:46:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>