<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Martin Stabe - Latest Comments in Is the Telegraph really Number 1?</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://martinstabe.disqus.com/is_the_telegraph_really_number_1/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:45:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is the Telegraph really Number 1?</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/30/is-the-telegraph-really-number-1/#comment-1928272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When I saw that claim on a tube ad I spat out my breakfast and started mumbling to myself incoherently. Nothing new in that but I was pretty outraged and immediately lost faith in HitWise. There is no way the Telegraph can be number 1 I thought and promptly checked the numbers when I got to work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As an old boss of mine once said, if a number is interesting it is usually wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the links Martin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee McEwan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:45:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>