<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Martin Stabe - Latest Comments in links for 2007-07-01</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://martinstabe.disqus.com/links_for_2007_07_01/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:51:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: links for 2007-07-01</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/07/01/links-for-2007-07-01/#comment-1928958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I posted a review of the new &lt;a href="http://CNN.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="CNN.com"&gt;CNN.com&lt;/a&gt; site at my blog (&lt;a href="http://www.patthorntonfiles.com/blog)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.patthorntonfiles.com/blog)"&gt;www.patthorntonfiles.com/blog)&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Overall, I like it, especially compared to the old CNN site. It's a technologically beautiful site. They just need to hire a few more journalists to really make it shine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pat Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:51:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>