<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Martin Stabe - Latest Comments in McLibel result good for blogs</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:35:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: McLibel result good for blogs</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2005/02/16/mclibel-result-good-for-blogs/#comment-1927582</link><description>Maybe you're just looking in the wrong places: &lt;a href="http://makeashorterlink.com/?J5532198A" rel="nofollow"&gt;Two anarchists win where cream of British journalism failed&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:35:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McLibel result good for blogs</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2005/02/16/mclibel-result-good-for-blogs/#comment-1927581</link><description>They won because the defendants had told totally wild and unprovable things. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The result is bad because it basically says that anyone can slander a company / Person wilfully and get our money to help them defend themselves.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EU Serf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:04:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>