<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Martin Stabe - Latest Comments in Observer: Many courses, too few jobs</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://martinstabe.disqus.com/observer_many_courses_too_few_jobs/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:06:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Observer: Many courses, too few jobs</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/09/23/observer-many-courses-too-few-jobs/#comment-1929450</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a shame the article itself doesn't allow comments, so I'll have to post here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure how too many media courses affects the representativeness of the media itself - surely broadening access to those courses makes it more likely that underrepresented groups get a foot in the door.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I do agree that low starting salaries and, particularly, the requirement for unpaid work experience in an expensive city, puts off a lot of poorer graduates. One of our graduates had to work for Natmags for 3 months for free - supporting herself in London (she was originally from Leeds) - before she landed a paid job. It isn't a route open to most people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:06:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Observer: Many courses, too few jobs</title><link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/09/23/observer-many-courses-too-few-jobs/#comment-1929449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You could say the same for historians, I suppose...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adrian Monck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>